home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.th-darmstadt.de!news!enno
- From: enno@inferenzsysteme.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Enno Sandner)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Moderation... what do you think?
- Date: 13 Jan 1996 13:37:02 GMT
- Organization: Fachbereich Informatik, TH Darmstadt
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <ENNO.96Jan13143702@kitz.inferenzsysteme.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>
- References: <DL3BoE.IK@rci.ripco.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kitz.intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
- In-reply-to: desade@ripco.com's message of Fri, 12 Jan 1996 22:55:26 GMT
-
- In article <DL3BoE.IK@rci.ripco.com> desade@ripco.com (Le Marquis de Sade) writes:
-
- I've noticed that there's a LOT of cross-posting going on in comp.lang.c++
- about things that really AREN'T C++ related. For example, people asking about
- Visual Basic. Others asking about OO methodology.
-
- Additionally, there is a lot of platform-dependent threadage regarding usage
- of Visual C++ or Borland C++ or whatnot. Should not those things be in
- alt.os.windows.programming??? (the precise name escapes me...my apologies).
-
- The truly C++ topics (how do I initialize an array of classes, discussions on
- heavy use of virtual functions versus templates, etc.) get lost in the
- shuffle.
-
- I suggest that someone moderates this heavily travelled group to improve the
- signal-to-noise ratio. What do you think? Any volunteers?
-
- That's a good idea --- However there already _are_ two moderated C++
- newsgroups, namely 'comp.lang.c++.moderated' and 'comp.std.c++'.
- The latter is the right place for discussion of the draft standard,
- the former is similar to this newsgroup.
-
- Enno
-
-